Security Council: Middle East envoy warns against escalation, highlights continued Israeli settlement activity

He urged all sides “to refrain from steps that will further exacerbate the situation and take immediate steps to de-escalate.”

Settlement activity continues

Mr. Wennesland made the appeal prior to updating ambassadors on the implementation of Security Council resolution 2334 (2016), which demands that Israel end all settlement activities in the Occupied Palestinian Territory, including East Jerusalem.

“Settlement activity has, nevertheless, continued,” he said, speaking via videoconference from Washington, DC, where he will meet with US officials.

The latest UN report on the issue covers the period from 11 June to 11 September, falling amid the ongoing war in Gaza and alarming levels of violence in the West Bank.

During this time, some 6,730 housing units were advanced or approved in the occupied West Bank, including East Jerusalem.  Construction tenders also were published for approximately 1,100 housing units in settlements, including 780 in East Jerusalem.

Relatedly, the Israel Defense Forces (IDF) Central Command signed a military order on 18 July amending a 1995 order that implemented the Oslo Accords – the first direct peace agreement between the sides. 

The move granted the local military commander authority over planning and construction in certain parts of Area B in the West Bank that had been transferred to the Palestinian Authority.

Demolitions and evictions

Demolitions and seizures of Palestinian-owned structures also continued.

“Citing the lack of Israeli-issued building permits, which are almost impossible for Palestinians to obtain, Israeli authorities demolished, seized, or forced people to demolish 373 structures, displacing 553 people, including 247 children. 26 of these structures were donor funded,” he said.

Meanwhile, Israel continued to evict Palestinians from their homes in East Jerusalem.  He highlighted the case of the Shehadeh family who were removed from their home in Silwan on 15 August, in favour of a settler organization, following a Supreme Court ruling.

Mr. Wennesland said the eviction displaced 35 people, while 188 Palestinians, including 111 children, left their occupied West Bank communities due to violence and harassment by settlers, and shrinking grazing land.

He noted that the reporting period also saw the International Court of Justice (ICJ) issue an Advisory Opinion on 19 July reaffirming that Israeli settlements were being maintained in violation of international law, and that new activity should cease. 

Furthermore, Israel’s continued presence in the Occupied Palestinian Territory was “unlawful” and should be brought to an end as rapidly as possible.

Gaza conflict

Mr. Wennesland also addressed the conflict in Gaza, noting that the UN Secretary-General reported that the level of suffering there is unprecedented in his mandate at the helm of the global body.

The Secretary-General said that in order to address the immense humanitarian needs and improve the intolerable conditions of civilians, Israel must fully open all crossings into the enclave.

Israel must also facilitate the immediate, safe, and unhindered delivery of humanitarian assistance at scale directly to the Palestinian civilian population throughout Gaza, in accordance with its obligations under international humanitarian law.
 

A 13-year-old girl makes her daily trip to her school, which is next to the Bet El Settlement in the West Bank (file).

A question for the Council

The Council also heard a briefing from Helen Clark, a former Prime Minister of New Zealand who also once headed the UN Development Programme (UNDP).

Ms. Clark is a member of the group of eminent global public figures known as The Elders, which has made resolution of the Israeli-Palestinian conflict a priority since its founding in 2007 by the late Nelson Mandela.

She said implementation of resolution 2334 “is acutely relevant to the current devastating phase of the conflict” and to any chance of a two-State solution.

“But its failure so far also poses an existential question: can the Security Council enforce its own resolutions? This is surely crucial to its credibility,” she said.

New approach needed

Ms. Clark emphasized that the Council has a responsibility to chart a path towards a sustainable peace, and a full, immediate and complete ceasefire in Gaza is an indispensable step.  Therefore, it was “deeply disturbing” that a Council resolution calling for a ceasefire remains unimplemented.

She highlighted the need for a new approach, grounded in international law, including enforcement of UN Security Council resolutions. 

“Council members who question the binding status of these resolutions, or who use their veto to protect an ally or to oppose a geo-political rival, are eroding the Council’s authority. They also undermine their own reputations and long-term interests,” she said.

Respect ICJ decisions

She added that all UN Member States are also bound to respect and comply with ICJ decisions which includes the provisional measures ordered to protect Palestinians in Gaza.

While non-binding, the ICJ Advisory Opinion “is an authoritative, landmark ruling,” and she urged the UN General Assembly and Security Council to pass resolutions indorsing it and setting out what action is required by Israel, other Member States, and the UN to end the occupation.

“The Elders welcome the passing of the General Assembly Resolution on this issue yesterday. How will the Security Council respond to the Advisory Opinion?” she asked.

Palestine: Uphold international law

The situation in the Occupied Palestinian Territory is “beyond grave”, and “there are no words left to describe Gaza’s agony”, the Permanent Observer for the observer State of Palestine told ambassadors.

Riyad Mansour said Israel “claims for itself all the rights afforded by international law and the Charter of this United Nations, while rejecting and breaching all the obligations”.

He said the Council’s role is to uphold international law, not to bend it to fit Israeli breaches, or to sacrifice the UN Charter to accommodate the country.

“That is the action needed to uphold international law, to implement UN resolutions, including 2334 which we are debating and discussing and reporting on its implementation, not merely more words to decry this abhorrent situation,” he said.

Israel: Whole world at risk

Ambassador Danny Danon of Israel said the Council remains “trapped in endless debates” as the world experiences a period of extraordinary instability.

“We gather here time and time again, like surgeons debating how to stitch a wound while the patient bleeds out before us.  The longer this body remains blind to the reality, the greater the cost that the world will pay,” he warned.

Mr. Danon said Israel is on “the frontline in a battle that threatens the entire region and the world,” and stands firm as it faces down “the forces of the most oppressive regime in the world, the Islamic Republic of Iran.”

He insisted that the Council and the world must wake up to the reality of this threat.

“The dark force driving the violence we see today is not a collection of independent groups. It is Iran pulling the strings,” he said.