EXPLAINED: Why Indians Are Unhappy With Rohit Sharmas New Profile Pic?
#NewProfilePic pic.twitter.com/aDJFxW8783
— Rohit Sharma (@ImRo45) July 8, 2024
The Controversial Profile Picture
On July 8, Sharma updated his profile picture on the social media platform X, choosing an image from the T20 World Cup celebrations. The photo captures a moment of pride and victory: Sharma planting the Indian flag at the Kensington Oval in Barbados. While the gesture was intended to symbolize India’s dominance and achievement, it quickly drew the ire of fans. The reason? The Indian Tricolour was seen touching the ground in the picture.
Fans’ Outcry and Legal Backdrop
The backlash was swift and intense. Social media platforms were flooded with criticism, as fans accused Sharma of disrespecting the national flag. Many highlighted a clause from the Prevention of Insults to National Honour Act, 1971, which states, “The flag shall not be allowed intentionally to touch the ground or the floor or trail in water.” This legal stipulation is well-known in India, where the national flag is held in deep reverence.
Comparisons with MS Dhoni
The controversy intensified as fans drew comparisons between Sharma and former captain MS Dhoni. Dhoni, renowned for his impeccable conduct both on and off the field, never allowed such lapses, further fueling the criticism against Sharma. The perceived disrespect towards the national symbol by a figure of Sharma’s stature was seen as a significant misstep.
Rohit Sharma’s Response
In an attempt to address the mounting criticism, Rohit Sharma released a video through the BCCI. He expressed his deep emotional connection to the Kensington Oval, the venue of India’s T20 World Cup victory. “I was feeling the moment when I went to the pitch because that pitch gave us this. We played on that particular pitch and we won the game,” Sharma explained. He emphasized that his intention was to honor the ground where India’s dreams were realized, not to disrespect the flag.
Public and Legal Repercussions
Despite Sharma’s explanation, the controversy continued to simmer. Legal experts weighed in, discussing the implications of the Prevention of Insults to National Honour Act, 1971. While it was clear that Sharma’s action was not intentional, the debate highlighted the importance of public figures adhering to national symbols’ respect and protocols.
The Larger Implications
This incident underscores the challenges public figures face in maintaining their image in the age of social media. Every action, intentional or otherwise, is subject to scrutiny and interpretation by a global audience. Sharma’s case serves as a reminder of the heightened responsibility that comes with fame, especially in a country as passionate and proud as India.
About The Author
