EXPLAINED: Why did Gary Kirsten Resign As Pakistan’s Head Coach Even After Test Series Win Against England?
Babar Azam’s Captaincy Drama and PCB’s Mixed Signals
One of the earliest signs of turbulence emerged with changes in Pakistan’s leadership structure. Babar Azam, who had previously captained the side across all formats, was reinstated as skipper only to step down shortly afterward, adding confusion to the team’s vision under Kirsten. With Babar’s role in flux, Pakistan’s white-ball squad faced instability at the top, hindering a consistent approach to the game. This lack of leadership clarity, along with a revolving door of players and officials, presented Kirsten with significant challenges.
Reports suggest that Kirsten’s coaching philosophy diverged sharply from some players and the Pakistan Cricket Board (PCB). His request to bring in David Reid, a high-performance coach known for tactical acumen, was denied by the PCB, which instead suggested alternative candidates. This rejection reportedly left Kirsten disillusioned, underscoring a misalignment in strategic planning between Kirsten and the PCB.
Kirsten’s Coaching Vision and the PCB’s Stance
Kirsten’s brief stint as head coach also saw Pakistan struggle during the T20 World Cup 2024. The team faced early exits, including unexpected losses to underdogs like the United States, ultimately bowing out to eventual champions India. Following this disappointing campaign, the Pakistan team faced an identity crisis, and Kirsten’s efforts to impose a clear, results-driven philosophy encountered resistance. For the PCB, maintaining a balance between traditional approaches and Kirsten’s progressive tactics became increasingly challenging, adding to the coach’s frustration.
Adding to the complexities, the PCB’s reluctance to invest in Kirsten’s proposed changes reflected a broader hesitation to depart from their traditional systems. This disparity between Kirsten’s strategic goals and PCB’s guarded approach to change contributed to a growing rift.
Options for PCB: Who Can Fill the Void?
With Kirsten’s exit now imminent, the PCB faces a race against time to secure a new head coach before Pakistan’s critical upcoming series against Australia and Zimbabwe. The Board has several options, with Jason Gillespie, the current red-ball coach, as a prime candidate. Gillespie’s experience and existing rapport with the team make him a logical choice for a short-term role, ensuring continuity in coaching strategy as the team gears up for the ICC Champions Trophy in 2025.
Another potential option is former Pakistan pacer Aaqib Javed. Currently serving on the national selection committee, Javed is highly regarded within the PCB for his insights into player development and strategy. Known for his role in Pakistan’s recent Test series victory over England, where he advocated a spin-friendly approach, Javed’s tactical awareness could benefit Pakistan’s white-ball team in high-stakes international tournaments.
A Missed Opportunity or a Necessary Change?
Gary Kirsten’s resignation has raised questions about PCB’s capacity to embrace change within the cricketing infrastructure. With high expectations upon his appointment, Kirsten’s early exit could be seen as a missed opportunity for a team seeking to regain international prominence. However, his decision also highlights the PCB’s enduring challenges in aligning its administrative framework with modern coaching expectations.
Kirsten’s departure might eventually serve as a wake-up call for the PCB to reassess its approach and prioritize coherence within the team’s coaching and leadership structures. A cohesive and visionary approach will be critical for Pakistan’s future, especially with the Champions Trophy 2025 on the horizon.
About The Author
